Rule of God vs rule of fallible human proxies
Bearing in mind Indonesia with an 85 percent Muslim population hasn't gone theocratic since her founding, I don't see why Malaysia with just over half the population being Muslims, must form an Islamic state.
In a democracy, a corrupt government can be voted out, however difficult the process may be. In a theocracy, I don't see how that can happen, not when the will of the people is discounted in favour of the Almighty's which is interpreted through a particular belief. It's not a very comforting thought.
History has shown how leaders, especially religious ones, can manipulate religion to satisfy their own ends. And to go against them and the theocratic system - God forbid! They are the 'divinely appointed' guardians and executors of the faith.
I don't mind the rule of God; it is the fallible human representatives I fear.
As surely as Muslims would oppose the theocratic system of another religion imposed on them, I too am opposed to an Islamic state imposed on me.
As for the writer calling on DAP to "make the right decision" and "help build the inevitable Islamic nation", I must say I do not share his defeatist attitude vis a vis the setting up of an Islamic state.
I believe a corrupt government can be changed with the help of God without the need to resort to a theocracy which is not representative of the other half of the population.
How about you?

