Although I am a regular reader of malaysiakini , I still think it is biased.

How can it describe in its report entitled [#1] Zam refuses to answer malaysiakini 's queries [/#] that George Soros is 'infamous'. You must understand that a news report is not a commentary, and the word 'infamous' is an adjective that passes moral judgment. On what grounds is it saying Soros is 'infamous'?

Soros may be 'infamous' to Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Mahathiristas who want a bogey to cover up their failure and incompetence. However, thus far, there is no concrete proof that Soros entered into the Malaysian market in 1997 or 1998. That was only the one-sided allegation by Mahathiristas and their propaganda machinery. Soros has denied that allegation.

On the contrary, Salomon Smith and Barney, which has been engaged by Mahathir's regime, is also said to have attacked the Hong Kong market. Why did Mahathiristas not attack it, but engaged it as the government's financial consultant using Malaysian taxpayers' money?

And malaysiakini also gave Umno Youth chief Hishammudin Hussein special space to air his party's view, but no such space is given to the Youth chiefs of PAS, DAP and Keadilan. Isn't it being biased against the opposition and for the government in this case?