Govt maintains ban on tobacco product displays
Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the government understands the challenges involved and already granted retailers six months to adjust to the new guidelines under the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852).
“We understand that there’s...
The Health Ministry is maintaining its stance on the April 2025 ban on tobacco product displays, despite retail groups saying the decision would burden small businesses with additional costs.
Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the government understands the challenges involved and already granted retailers six months to adjust to the new guidelines under the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852).
“We understand that there’s some pushback regarding the display ban, particularly due to the cost of compliance.
“We’ve provided a comfortable six-month window to allow for a gradual transition and encourage mutual understanding through engagement sessions,” he said.
Dzulkefly said this after launching the Occupational Safety and Health Day celebration at the Health Ministry in Putrajaya today.
This came after the Federation of Sundry Goods Merchants Associations of Malaysia (FSGMAM) raised concerns about the ban and urged the government for a better guideline to reduce the impact on small businesses.
Act 852 includes regulations governing the registration, sale, packaging, labelling, and prohibition of smoking in public places.
The act imposes stricter requirements on cigarette and vape retailers, including a ban on openly displaying these products on business premises.
For a first offence, a fine not exceeding RM20,000 or imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both may be imposed. However, for a second or subsequent offence, the penalties are more severe, with a fine not exceeding RM30,000, imprisonment not exceeding two years, or both.
Dzulkefly said his ministry will move forward with the regulation, which will require retailers to alter their store displays to hide tobacco products.
However, he said the concerns expressed by industry players will be addressed in upcoming dialogues.
“While we recognise there are pros and cons, we’re confident that ongoing discussions will lead to the best solution for all parties involved,” he added.
When asked if there was any possibility of reversing the decision, Dzulkefly reiterated that the six-month extension was specifically to allow time for retailers to prepare.
