Adib inquest: Bid to include 'save temple' members, devotees fails
Yasmin RamlanPublished: Jan 31, 2019 1:59 PM | Updated: Feb 13, 2019 7:22 PM
INQUEST | Coroner Rofiah Mohamad rules that the two groups are not interested parties.
- LifetimeACTIVEINACTIVEEXPIRED
- Registered on:Renews on:ACTIVEINACTIVEEXPIRED
- Subscribe
- Renew
- Extend Subscription
- Settings
- Contact Support
- Sign Out
If they are not interested parties, why do they want to be represented in the inquest? Why after being rejected, they still persist to file appeal to the High Court?
Who are these authorities? It's not true to say the fireman was injured during violence (alleged) at the temple or that he sucuumbed to the injuries. He had reportedly no injuries anywhere. The Inquest is to facilitate the issuance of the death certificate. The death certificate must state cause of death. The cause will be a medical and scientific one. At present, no death certificate has been issued despite the post-mortem. Another is underway. The facts show the fireman had six crushed ribs. After he died, it was discovered he had undetected fractures below. Apparently, there were no injuries on the fireman. The media should not mislead the people.
Flawed! The Temple should be represented as it happened on the temple premises!