COMMENT When I wrote about how “The law has truly become an ass” back in February 2010 about the battle of the two menteris besar in the Perak power grab impasse, I meant it.

I was totally disgusted and appalled by the apex court finally returning a verdict of 5-0 in favour of Zambry Abdul Kadir over Nizar Jamaluddin.

Whatever little regard I had for the judiciary entirely dissipated with that decision. It has never recovered since.

The High Court’s acquittal of former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim on Monday has not changed my opinion of the judiciary either.

And it’s not just about being a sceptic as the saying, “a swallow doesn’t make a summer”, suggests. It’s also not about the presiding judge not dismissing this frivolous case from the outset.

NONELest you’re still wondering about my despondency and disdain for the judiciary, it’s all about the extreme humiliation we are subjected to as the country is being given global real-time coverage by CNN and Al-Jazeera, et al... all because of Malaysia’s obsession with someone’s anal virginity.

If Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan’s allegation of being sodomised eight or nine times over a period of two months by a 60-plus-old man with a bad back is to be believed, it doesn’t take a pundit to tell you that the predator must by now be whipped and jailed.

Given the firepower of the government machinery, both overt and covert, and better still for the investigating team that it’s the second sodomy charge against Anwar, you would have thought they would be able to prove this charge beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt.

All the more if the government truly believes that this one man is Public Enemy No 1.    

Good try, old man

But alas, by God’s grace, mercy and infinite knowledge, and to the amazement and shock of everyone present in court on Monday morning, a verdict of “acquittal and discharge” was handed down by the judge Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah in less than three minutes.

I was in court, and like everyone else, was simply dumbfounded. Again, this former deputy PM has been exonerated.

I had been willing to accept any verdict and in fact scenario-planned all eventualities. Every scenario, best and worst case, has its upside and downside for both sides, that is, the federal government (BN) and the opposition (Pakatan Rakyat).

But to have the BN leaders, including the PM, unashamedly telling the rakyat that the judiciary is independent and credible because it acquitted Anwar is certainly the first darnedest thing said in 2012 in the political arena.

At the start of the new year, respected blogger Marina Mahathir called for a “End Stupid Statements” campaign. It looks like we really need one, after reading and hearing some of the statements made after the Sodomy II verdict.

Lest you fail to see the perverted logic of the BN leaders’ statements, let’s try a different scenario, where the verdict came back as “guilty”.

Are the PM and other leaders saying that if the court found Anwar guilty of sodomy, the judiciary is no longer independent and credible?

NONEThis is idiocy and lunacy of the severest degree. A judiciary that is independent and has integrity is not judged by a single verdict. It has to gain the trust and respect of the entire citizenry through doggedly delivering justice without fear or favour. Every time.

As if that statement of Anwar’s acquittal proving the judiciary is indeed independent wasn’t moronic enough to make this nation a laughing stock again in the eyes of the global legal community, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, alleged by many to be the master strategist of Sodomy I and perhaps, as claimed by some, working in concert with the current administration in Sodomy II, declares that the acquittal proves there is no conspiracy against Anwar.

Despite the 87 days of court hearing, 27 witnesses for the prosecution team, the judge could rule that the prosecution had not done enough to prove Anwar had committed sodomy.

And it is not a conspiracy? Good try, old man. We wish we could believe you.

Who bears the cost?

It’s not that the prosecution had not done enough. There was simply not enough evidence. And for a second attempt, some might allude, failure to prosecute was indeed extremely disgraceful.

And finally, the cost of all this legal wrangling.

Who bears it? And how much exactly is the burden on taxpayers’ money? Sodomy complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan is now mulling an appeal. Sigh.

The buck stops with you, Mr PM. Let’s stop this gutter politics. Let’s all make a commitment to build this country of ours into a great and respectable nation again.

Yes, we are in a zero-sum game, but let it be on the plane of policy advocacy, performance, and political-intellectual acumen and not a destructive gutter politics of the worst order.

Let us be a functional democracy and stop doing more of the same things. This is the path to genuine reform and redemption.

If we are in denial, we do it at our peril and we will die by our own swords.

 

DR DZULKEFLY AHMAD is the MP for Kuala Selangor and executive director of the PAS Research Centre.


Related stories

Appeal sodomy case, Saiful's father pleads to AG

Umno veteran: Sodomy verdict alone not sufficient

Anwar's acquittal alters political landscape

Sodomy acquittal is BN's last throw of the dice

And who shall apologise to Anwar?

Case should have been dismissed from the get-go

Muhyiddin waging battle on two fronts